PLATFORM OVERVIEW
The Zuben Platform
Four execution modes covering 100% of daily legal workflows — from 2-second extractions to 15+ minute verified memoranda. One platform. One audit trail.
Constellation
Multi-stage verified pipeline producing partner-reviewable memoranda with complete provenance. Every proposition audited against the authority it cites. The pipeline blocks its own output rather than deliver unverified work.
- ✦Multi-stage pipeline with schema-validated artifacts at every stage
- ✦Two hard verification gates — pre-draft structural and post-draft faithfulness
- ✦340+ work product templates — memos, briefs, due diligence reports, and more
- ✦Automatic forum-specific court rules for litigation work product
- ✦Complete provenance chain for every factual claim and citation
Analyze enforceability of non-compete clause under Delaware law for senior VP departing to competitor
✓ Intake · ✓ Classification · ✓ Authority Discovery · ✓ Deep Research · ✓ Synthesis · ✓ Gate 1 Passed
Work product: Memorandum of Law · Template: Restrictive Covenant Analysis
Under Delaware law, restrictive covenants are enforceable only if reasonable in scope, duration, and geographic limitation. Kodak Graphic Commc'ns Can. Co. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 2016 WL 7384768 (Del. Ch. Dec. 20, 2016). [VERIFIED ✓ — authority text confirms reasonableness requirement at cited page]
Compass
Guided analytical session powered by the full research protocol. You steer the direction; the platform provides the methodology, the depth ratchet, and the analytical discipline. Verb precision, posture traps, deference-layer separation — all built in.
- ✦Research Protocol v2 methodology embedded in every session
- ✦Interactive depth — follow threads, challenge assumptions, narrow scope
- ✦185+ work product templates available during session
- ✦Session produces exportable artifacts with provenance
Analysis of indemnification obligations under SPA for target company environmental liabilities
I've identified 4 sub-issues: (1) scope of environmental reps, (2) survival period for indemnification claims, (3) basket/cap structure, (4) known vs. unknown contamination distinction. Which should I prioritize?
Focus on known contamination — the Phase II report flagged PFAS in groundwater at the manufacturing site.
Analyzing PFAS-specific indemnification precedents. Note: post-Loper Bright, EPA's PFAS enforcement posture creates regulatory uncertainty that affects indemnification valuation…
Scout
Fast multi-perspective advisory mode. Parallel specialist viewpoints deliver structurally-checked triage guidance. Get oriented before committing to deep research — know which issues matter, what the competing positions look like, and where to dig deeper.
- ✦Parallel SME fan-out — multiple specialist perspectives simultaneously
- ✦Structural checks on every response (not full verification)
- ✦Ideal for partner questions, initial client calls, and matter triage
- ✦Natural escalation to Constellation for issues requiring verification
Client wants to know exposure from a WARN Act claim after laying off 120 employees across 3 states
Federal WARN requires 60-day notice for 100+ employees. Each state may have mini-WARN with lower thresholds…
Per-employee damages of 60 days back pay + benefits. Class action risk if pattern across facilities…
Voluntary compliance payments may reduce exposure. Consider phased separation to stay below thresholds…